Liquidation — order passed
21 of 2 closed — by dissolution, going-concern sale or compromise.
Liquidation mandates2on this professional's record
Closed11 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value0.0%across 1 case with both figures · all liquidations on record 81.1%
Liquidation order to dissolution22 moaverage over 1 dissolved case · the table’s Duration is CIRP to liquidation order
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | CIRP period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manomay Ventures Private Limited |
RP · Sep 2026
|
— | — | — | 1y 11mo
Oct 2024 → Sep 2026
|
| Trump Impex Private Limited |
Liquidator · Mar 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 3y 6mo
Aug 2019 → Mar 2023
|
CIRP period = insolvency commencement to the liquidation order. It can start before this professional's own appointment. Figures shown for orders in the last 90 days — the full financial record is member data.
Voluntary liquidations
2Solvent member-voluntary liquidations under s.59 — a separate mandate type from CIRP, and a different job: no creditors' committee, no resolution plan, a surplus to return.
Typical time to dissolution1y 8mo
median across every VL on record — none of these mandates has reached dissolution yet
| Corporate Debtor | Appointed | Realised | Paid to Creditors | Surplus | Commenced → dissolved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutland DCC Ink Manufacturing Private Limited |
Voluntary Liquidator · Apr 2023 |
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | in process |
| Bhaveshwar Finvest Private Limited |
Voluntary Liquidator · Jul 2024 |
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | in process |
Realised, paid and surplus figures are member data. Figures shown where an outcome has been filed.
Dates in each row are taken from the tribunal’s dissolution order. The comparison is the median of every voluntary liquidation on record.
Source: IBBI register and published data. How we source and correct →
Report an error →
Role mix
IRP — interim1
Resolution Professional2
Liquidator1
Voluntary Liquidator2
Of these, 1 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — mandates vs the forum's tempo
Mumbai3 mandates
Bench median 18 months to outcome · 34% resolved (1,273 concluded cases)
Atul runs a median 23 months to outcome across 1 concluded mandate.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 18 months, weighted by how many of Atul's cases each one holds —
so Atul is taking 151 days longer than those benches.
Sector exposure
Construction & Infrastructure1
Chemicals & Plastics1
Real Estate & Housing1
Trying to reach Atul?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.
Is this your profile?
This page is built from IBBI's public record, and the case pages on your record link to it. Claiming is free — one code to your IBBI-registered email — and puts you in control: your photo, your story, a contact button.