Resolved — plan approved
3Acquirer shown where the approved plan names one. Figures shown for outcomes in the last 90 days — the full financial record is member data.
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Realisable (plan) | Rec vs LV | CIRP period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Solar Voltaic Power LLP
AAC1312
→ acquired by Valente Lifespace Creators Private Limited
|
IRP · Sep 2023
RP · Oct 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 15 mo
Sep 2023 → Dec 2024
|
|
Suzuki Textiles Limited
→ acquired by Sai Leela Synthetics Private Limited
|
IRP · Jan 2022
RP · Mar 2022
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 12 mo
Jan 2022 → Jan 2023
|
|
Baldva Textiles Private Limited
→ acquired by BMD International Pvt. Ltd
|
IRP · Nov 2021
RP · Dec 2021
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 12 mo
Nov 2021 → Nov 2022
|
Liquidation — order passed
94 of 9 closed — by dissolution, going-concern sale or compromise.
Liquidation mandates9on this professional's record
Closed45 still in process
Distributed vs liquidation value72.7%across 3 cases with both figures · all liquidations on record 81.1%
Liquidation order to dissolution30 moaverage over 4 dissolved cases · the table’s Duration is CIRP to liquidation order
| Corporate Debtor | Role / Appointed | Admitted | Distributed | Rec vs Claims | CIRP period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aastha Buildhome Developers Private Limited |
IRP · Dec 2022
RP · Jan 2023
|
— | — | — | 3y 8mo
Dec 2022 → Aug 2026
|
| Jawan Construction Private Limited |
IRP · Sep 2022
RP · Oct 2022
Liquidator · Nov 2023
|
🔒 | 🔒 | 🔒 | 14 mo
Sep 2022 → Nov 2023
|
CIRP period = insolvency commencement to the liquidation order. It can start before this professional's own appointment. Figures shown for orders in the last 90 days — the full financial record is member data.
Source: IBBI register and published data. How we source and correct →
Report an error →
Role mix
IRP — interim22
Resolution Professional16
Liquidator6
Voluntary Liquidator1
Of these, 22 began as an IRP appointment — the interim role the tribunal fills on admission, before the committee of creditors confirms or replaces it.
Benches — mandates vs the forum's tempo
Jaipur19 mandates
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 36% resolved (78 concluded cases)
New Delhi1 mandate
Bench median 17 months to outcome · 35% resolved (789 concluded cases)
Kolkata1 mandate
Bench median 14 months to outcome · 34% resolved (531 concluded cases)
Ahmedabad1 mandate
Bench median 15 months to outcome · 32% resolved (451 concluded cases)
Prashant runs a median 14 months to outcome across 12 concluded mandates.
The benches those mandates sit in run at 17 months, weighted by how many of Prashant's cases each one holds —
so Prashant is closing 62 days faster than those benches.
Sector exposure
Construction & Infrastructure6
Textiles & Apparel4
Real Estate & Housing3
Trading & Distribution3
Other Manufacturing2
Power & Energy1
Chemicals & Plastics1
Steel & Metals1
Trying to reach Prashant?
This profile is unclaimed, so direct contact isn't listed. Leave your details and we'll route the introduction.
Is this your profile?
This page is built from IBBI's public record, and the case pages on your record link to it. Claiming is free — one code to your IBBI-registered email — and puts you in control: your photo, your story, a contact button.